Brian Ho

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Darfur

Darfur Conflict
Main article: Darfur conflict
The Darfur conflict is an ongoing armed conflict between the Janjaweed militia group and the mostly land-tilling tribes of the region. Although this specific conflict in Darfur has occurred since 2003, the mentality behind the conflict stems from the 1960s and 1970s. The ideology of Arab supremacism grew in northern Africa. In the countries of North Africa, as well as many Arab nations, a secret group called “Tajamu al Arabi”, or the Arab Gathering, formed and would emerge in the Darfur region in the 1980s. This group began creating tensions between Non-Arab Africans and Muslims in the region with violent attacks against the Non-Arab Africans. The Sudanese government became involved in the 1990s, funding militia groups who were carrying out the attacks. It was not until early 2003 that the Non-Arab Africans began to combine their forces to protect themselves against the militia groups. Two of the main groups—the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement—combined to create the National Redemption Front. The Sudanese government, however, saw this uprising of Non-Arab Africans as a threat against the nation of Sudan and, thus began funding a group known as the Janjaweed to quell the rebellion of the National Redemption Front. However, due to the prospects of peace, a faction of the Sudanese Liberation Army broke away from the National Redemption Front in order to come to a peace agreement with the Sudanese government—this prospect of peace would turn out to be an empty promise from the Sudanese government. It is estimated that "no less than 200,000" people have lost their lives since the beginning of this conflict.[5] The conflict began in February 2003, when rebel groups began attacking government targets. The government retaliated by launching a military and police campaign. The government has been accused of encouraging a group of Arab nomads called the Janjaweed to rape, murder and loot the African farmers[citation needed]. Because of this, more than 3,500,000 people have fled their homes. Unlike the Second Sudanese Civil War, which was fought between the primarily Muslim north and Christian and Animist south, in Darfur most of the residents are Muslim, as are the Janjaweed.
Attempts at mediation by the African Union led to a peace accord between the Sudanese government and the largest rebel group in the Darfur region, signed May 5, 2006[2], but the United Nations says that there has actually been a dramatic increase in violence and displacement since the deal was signed[3].
Those who fled the Janjaweed now live in refugee camps across Darfur, as well as in neighboring Chad. About 2.5 million refugees have crossed the border into neighboring Chad.
Many Darfurian children, even in the refugee camps, are malnourished and starving to death. Aid workers in Darfur are denied access to some parts of Darfur[citation needed]. The Sudan government will not allow United Nations forces to enter Sudan[citation needed].
The United Nations has threatened military intervention[citation needed], but the Sudanese government argues that it is caught in a continuing civil war and that no outside powers should seek to meddle in its internal affairs[citation needed].
In January 2007, President Omar al-Bashir agreed to a cease-fire whereby the Sudanese "government and rebel groups will cease hostilities for a period of 60 days while they work towards a lasting peace" [4], however, according to the Save Darfur Coalition, this cease-fire was broken weeks later when military aircraft bombed civilians in Darfur[5].
The International Criminal Court has indicted State Minister for Humanitarian Affairs Ahmed Haroun and alleged Janjaweed militia leader Ali Mohammed Ali aka Ali Kosheib,in relation to the atrocites in the region. Ahmed Haroun belongs to the Fur tribe one of the non Arab tribes of Darfur and is alleged to have incited attacks on specific ethnic groups. Ali Kosheib is an ex soldier and a leader of the popular defense forces and is cocked to be one of the key leaders responsible for attacks on villages in West Darfur.

News Article 3 - Political Issue

Article can be found at: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=sudan+darfur&btnG=Search

Sample Headlines...
Bush issues warning to Sudan
Newsday, NY - 40 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush warned Sudan's president yesterday that he has one "last chance" to end the violence in Darfur before the United ...
UN accuses Sudan over weapons
BBC News, UK - 42 minutes ago
The Sudanese government has been accused of violating a UN arms embargo by flying weapons into Darfur in breach of UN Security Council resolutions. ...
Bush says US readying Sudan sanctions
Baltimore Sun, MD - 1 hour ago
By James Gerstenzang and Maggie Farley. WASHINGTON // President Bush said yesterday that if UN efforts to bring peace to Darfur do not soon bear fruit, ...
Bush urges Sudan to end Darfur crisis
Indianapolis Star, IN - 1 hour ago
By Jennifer Loven. AP. WASHINGTON -- President Bush, ramping up pressure on Sudan, said Wednesday the United States will tighten economic sanctions and ...
Bush lauds US Holocaust Museum's efforts on Darfur
Jerusalem Post, Israel - 1 hour ago
By HILARY LEILA KRIEGERJERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT. Praising the US Holocaust Memorial Museum for its work to stop the genocide in Darfur, President George ...
Bush pressures Sudan
Kansas City Star, MO - 1 hour ago
He threatens economic sanctions if al-Bashir’s government doesn’t end the violence in Darfur. By WILLIAM DOUGLAS. WASHINGTON | President Bush warned Sudan’s ...
Bush presses Sudan on Darfur, threatening sanctions
International Herald Tribune, France - 1 hour ago
By Sheryl Gay Stolberg. WASHINGTON: President George W. Bush invoked the powerful imagery of the Holocaust on Wednesday to intensify pressure on Sudan, ...
US and UK to discuss Darfur resolution Thursday - Blair
Reuters South Africa, South Africa - 1 hour ago
By Adrian Croft. LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Tony Blair said on Wednesday talks would start on Thursday on a new UN resolution to try to end ...
Britain threatens Sudan with sanctions
Swissinfo, Switzerland - 2 hours ago
By Steve Holland. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States and Britain, ratcheting up the pressure on Sudan, threatened it on Wednesday with sanctions and ...
Bush Unveils And Delays Sanctions For Sudan
Washington Post, DC - 3 hours ago
By Michael Abramowitz and Glenn Kessler. President Bush unveiled a new package of sanctions against Sudan yesterday for failing to cooperate with ...
West Threatens Sudan Sanctions
Sky News, UK - 5 hours ago
The US and Britain are threatening Sudan with sanctions unless it agrees to accept a UN peacekeeping force in Darfur. President George W Bush has warned ...
Sudan has last chance to avoid US sanctions: Bush
Toronto Star, Canada - 5 hours ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Bush warned Sudan's president Wednesday he had one last chance to stop violence in Darfur or else the United States would ...
Report: Sudan Violated Un Arms Embargo
Guardian Unlimited, UK - 6 hours ago
From AP. By EDITH M. LEDERER. AP Writer. UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The Sudanese government violated a UN arms embargo by flying military aircraft, ...
Bush Threatens New Sanctions On Sudan
Guardian Unlimited, UK - 6 hours ago
From AP. AP Photo DCPM103, DCPM102, DCPM105, DCPM101, DCPM104. By JENNIFER LOVEN. AP Writer. WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush, ramping up pressure on Sudan, ...
Report: Sudan violated UN arms embargo by flying military aircraft ...
San Diego Union Tribune, CA - 6 hours ago
By Edith M. Lederer. AP. UNITED NATIONS – The Sudanese government violated a UN arms embargo by flying military aircraft, weapons and ammunition into ...
Bush gives Sudan 'last chance'
Aljazeera.net, Qatar - 6 hours ago
The US president has warned Sudan's president that he has one "last chance" to stop violence in Darfur before the US imposes sanctions and considers other ...
Bush says US will impose new punishments if Sudan fails to act to ...
International Herald Tribune, France - 7 hours ago
AP. WASHINGTON: President George W. Bush says the United States will tighten economic sanctions and impose new ones if Sudan's president continues to dawdle ...
Report: Sudan Violated UN Arms Embargo
Forbes, NY - 7 hours ago
By EDITH M. LEDERER 04.18.07, 9:01 PM ET. The Sudanese government violated a UN arms embargo by flying military aircraft, weapons and ammunition into ...
Bush dishes 'last chance' on Sudan
The Age, Australia - 7 hours ago
President George W Bush has warned Sudan's president that he has one last chance to stop violence in Darfur or else the United States will impose sanctions ...
Bush threatens new sanctions on Sudan
Minneapolis Star Tribune (subscription), MN - 8 hours ago
He said President Al-Bashir has a last chance to stop the violence in Darfur before Washington seeks tighter restrictions. ...
Us Push For Sudan Sanctions Opposed
Guardian Unlimited, UK - 10 hours ago
From AP. AP Photo DCPM106, DCPM103. By EDITH M. LEDERER. AP Writer. UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Britain and the United States said Wednesday they will propose new ...
US, UK threaten Sudan with sanctions
Sydney Morning Herald, Australia - 10 hours ago
The United States and Britain, ratcheting up the pressure on Sudan, threatened it on Wednesday with sanctions and other punitive measures unless it agreed ...
Sudan weapons flow breaches Darfur resolution: UN
Reuters Canada, Canada - 10 hours ago
By Patrick Worsnip. UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The Sudanese government is flying weapons and other military equipment into Darfur in violation of United ...
US and UK to step up pressure on Sudan
MSNBC - 11 hours ago
The United States and Britain said they were stepping up their efforts to put pressure on Sudan at the United Nations on Wednesday over the humanitarian ...
US push for Sudan sanctions opposed
Houston Chronicle, TX - 11 hours ago
By EDITH M. LEDERER AP Writer. © 2007 AP. UNITED NATIONS — Britain and the United States said Wednesday they will propose new UN sanctions to pressure the ...
Bush Threatens New Sanctions on Sudan
ABC News - 15 hours ago
President Bush speaks at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, Wednesday, April 18, 2007. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais). By JENNIFER LOVEN ...
Bush Threatens Sudan Over Darfur Bloodshed
CBS News, NY - 15 hours ago
(CBS/AP) President Bush said Wednesday that the United States will tighten economic sanctions and impose new punishments if Sudan fails to take concrete ...
Bush cautions Sudan on Darfur
Baltimore Sun, MD - 15 hours ago
By Jennifer Loven. AP. WASHINGTON // President Bush said today that the United States will tighten economic sanctions and impose new punishments if Sudan ...
UN and African Union announce 2-pronged plan to bring peace to Darfur
San Diego Union Tribune, CA - 15 hours ago
By Edith M. Lederer. AP. UNITED NATIONS – The United Nations and African Union are pledging to move “expeditiously” to deploy 3000 UN peacekeepers to Darfur ...
Bush Threatens New Sanctions On Sudan
Guardian Unlimited, UK - 16 hours ago
From AP. AP Photo DCHG107. By JENNIFER LOVEN. AP Writer. WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush said Wednesday that the United States will tighten economic ...

Thursday, March 1, 2007

News Article 2 - Environmental Issue

Who's Lying? A Simple Tale of Unbiased Global Warming Facts -
by Ed Ward

Who's Lying? A Simple Tale of Unbiased Global Warming Facts - Goldilocks Meets Lost in Space: "The Three Mysterious CO2 Planets" (Many embedded reference links in this article here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/2)
The climate involves many facets of complex science and those wishing to mislead for blood moneys are more than happy to make it even more technical if it supports their uncaring, greedy and biased objectives. The objective of this article is to find the unbiased truth in a format that most can understand. No one knows every minuscule aspect of what produces our climate, but the major reactants are known. Almost all of the references are from studies that are unrelated to Earth's industrial global warming and are almost universally accepted.While researching our solar systems three CO2 planets' atmospheres and temperatures, Johnson's "Goldilocks and the Three Planets" popped up. This short, entertaining, and informative article is highly recommended for a brief overall view of the climates of Venus, Earth, and Mars, the Greenhouse effect, and the CO2 cycle (including volcanic action for the "no SUVs" history majors). It's amusing title seemed unique until it was Googled and 73 other references popped up. One of which was an informative 10 minute video with a slightly different perspective.It is extremely important to note that the Greenhouse Effect of CO2 on Venus and Marsare virtually undisputed. The CO2 molecule is a greenhouse gas because of its dipolar characteristics which absorb and radiate the infrared energy (1/3 the wavelength of a microwave). The effects of infrared energy on dipolar molecules are also virtually undisputed. Apparently, no 'scientist' was able to gain personal blood or grant money for disputing these facts. The current atmosphere of Venus is about 96% CO2 at 90 times the density of Earth's (93 million miles from the sun) atmosphere which is about 100 times the density of Mars' atmosphere. Venus (67 million miles from the sun) has an average temperature of 855 F, while Mercury's (36 million miles from the sun with virtually no atmosphere) temperature ranges from -300 F to 870 F. Venus is hotter than Mercury in spite of being almost twice the distance from the sun which should make Venus (if it had no atmosphere) about 200 F cooler than Mercury. The current thin atmosphere of Mars (142 million miles from the sun) contains 95% CO2 with less than 1% of the atmospheric pressure of Earth. The temperature range is from a high of 98 F to a low of -190 F. This sparse compaction of the greenhouse gas CO2 by Mars' weak gravitational force is only enough to raise the surface temperature by 9 F."The Discovery of the Greenhouse Effect" (1820) on Earth (93 million miles from the sun) is also virtually undisputed. Without the greenhouse effect of the gases of our current atmosphere, Earth would be a very inhospitable planet and about 90 F cooler(also a good article for basic climate information). CO2 is a proven planet warmer. CO2 has increased from less than .03% (280 ppm) to .04% (390 ppm) in the last two decades without any signs of decreasing. Earth is rapidly approaching ½ the CO2 effects of Mars which is responsible for at least 9 F without the effects of other greenhouse gases - water vapor, methane, N2O, various hydrocarbons - all of which add their warming effects. Once, like Venus, these compounds reach a concentration where more heat is retained than removed, as is the current situation, a runaway greenhouse effect is started. There is one proven way this effect has stopped of its own accord - the melting of all of the ice on the planet. Will it be enough to prevent the formation of another Venus? The facts say that Earth will start finding out by the year 2040.While it is believed that Venus and Earth started as very similar planets, Venus suffered a "runaway" greenhouse effect. This event occurred sometime between four billion years ago when the sun was 30 to 40% cooler (this process continues daily at an imperceptible level - to such a small degree that it might take a century to notice a measurable change in the massive amounts of energy released) and now. The slightly smaller gravitational force and closer proximity to the sun explains why Venus would runaway prior to Earth. An average surface temperature of 80 F is believed to be the temperature range at which the runaway effect would start on Earth. The basic properties of the gaseous components of the atmosphere are fairly standard science and are further illustrated by the current temperatures/climates/atmospheres of Venus and Mars. The blanket analogy for greenhouse effect is an excellent one. If one compares the amounts/density of greenhouse gases to the thread count of a blanket/sheet, the effects are very similar and more easily understood. Mars' blanket has a thread count of one with minimal greenhouse effect, while the Venus' blanket has a thread count 9,ooo and retains 99.9% of the heat that reaches its surface. Currently, Earth is in between those two climates. One day, hopefully millions of years from now as the sun continues its normal star progression, Earth will become Venus long before the sun reaches a red giant phase. However, basic chemistry and physics clearly show that mankind's actions may drastically shorten the length of time for that to happen.In the billions of years it took for life to develop on Earth, complete/incomplete meltdowns of Earth's ice sheets has happened several times, without a runaway greenhouse occurring. So far, the article has only dealt with the 'positive feedback' loops of global warming. There are many 'negative feedback' loops that exist in nature to cool the earth, but history has shown that the negative feedback loops will not be significant enough to stop the complete meltdown of all natural ice sheets on Earth under the circumstances that existed in the past or in the present. Second verse, same as the first... but a little different. So far the article has not included is the destruction of rain forests by the shifting of weather patterns, the acidity of the oceans decreasing the removal of CO2 in our normal carbon cycle, and the 900 billion tons of CO2 (90 times the amount of yearly CO2 production - as well as tons of methane) awaiting dispersal from it's resting place in the ice that is melting.There is nothing we can do to control the solar cycle (although there is ample evidence our government is trying with chemtrails), animal production of methane, and thephysics of water vapor. But, there are existing easy methods of dealing with CO2production and more difficult methods for dealing with methane production from refuse.Complete melting of all natural ice on the planet will result in 200 to 300 feet of sea level rise based on previous occurrences. When this happens (some have evidence of its occurrence prior to 2040 and being beyond the point of no return - the most accurate assessment of our current situation, although it is slightly optimistic in this reporter's opinion), there will certainly be some 'negative feedback' loops placed on global warming. The surface area of more reflective water will be dramatically increased - although this will be counteracted by the loss of more reflective ice sheets. Millions of coastal area inhabitants will be displaced or killed like the residents of New Orleans that were murdered by covering up the rising sea levels of global warming. Fertile farm lands will be drastically reduced by rising tides. Starvation will assure that there are far fewer sapiens to worry about or to pollute the environment. Salt water will contaminate many of our water sources that are not already drained, polluted by radiation or toxic chemicals (the reason 'the shrub' bought Paraguay - third largest aquifer and possibly the only large clean water source left - one can live without oil or gold, but you cannot live without water - How much will it be worth?) . We will not have to drive nearly as far to get to the beach. Hydro power sources will be much more available and there will be far fewer people requiring energy by the time they can be built. There is no doubt that some on the global warming issue have finances influencing their actions. There is no doubt that most (all this reporter has seen) of the global warming 'debunkers' have financial reasons for their actions. However, there is a vast difference between supporting science facts for the continuance of all of mankind, and ignoring/hiding/distraction of science facts for the destruction of mankind for the sake of blood money. Just as there is a vast difference between creating a study to evaluate the facts and come to a conclusion (IPCC - click play - 2,500 expert reviewers, 800 authors, 450 lead authors, 130 nations), creating a conclusion for the cherry picking of any evidence to support that conclusion (ExxonMobil), or deliberately censoring all information in scientific articles contrary to massive profits (the shrub).Anyone in the past that has denied greenhouse effects, or the fact this planet is warming - the solar cycle still accounts for about ½ the temperature rise since 1900, it fails to explain a rise of 0.4 C since 1980 (It's the heat being retained that is causing the temperature rise), or has taken money to prove a conclusion with some facts rather than taking all the facts to form a conclusion, should at the very least be read with skepticism of their motives. The Richard Lindzen crews. The honorable scientist Lindzen has stated that global warming activists deserve a special place in hell. This reporter believes Lindzen and his "serial murder corporations" deserves a special place in three hells - a tobacco hell, an asbestos hell, and a CO2 hell - as well as a well-deserved trial and place in a prison cell for fraudulent contributions of bastardizing science that has resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands.The Kyoto pact - A Slight Division of NWO Agendas for Cash and Power. While 'the shrub' denies and classifies (at least until very recently denying, but probably still classifying the real facts) global warming for expansion of corporate and personal greed in his NWO agenda of the ineffectual buying and selling of pollution credits. The UN uses global warming for its NWO agenda of 'savior' for gaining control of countries with its trivial reductions of CO2 decades from now. Both of these scenarios promote the continuance of the problem rather than a complete shift from the problem - an oil driven economy with corporate and government control. Current hydrocarbon conversion to electricity wastes between 30 and 60% of the potential energy with the majority wasting as much as the process converts. Transfer of electricity over a great distance further degrades the conversion effectiveness. Even without further development of alternate energy sources there are currently more than adequate ways to completely change our delivery of needed energy without 'living in a cave' as the debunkers like promote. These current technologies are not cost effective because this government has supported the creation of massive profit corporations, instead of supplementing self sustaining individual energy creation and usage and alternate existing transportation. Personnel solar, wind and water energy converters and vehicles get no subsidies, credits, or adoption by this government. Instead, the government prefers to subsidize the corporations and let alternate energy die on the vine. Tesla Motors already has an impressive electric performance roadster with plans to produce a vehicle more along the lines of a transportation car. GM and Toyota had electric cars and NiMh- Lithium batteries that were allowed to die on the vine. If any of these already existing technologies had been given a chance to compete with the destructive forms of hydrocarbon energy usage by subsidy, incentives, or taxing, they would have the volumes of production required to lower the manufacturing costs to where they would be directly competitive with our existing vehicles - similar to the reduced costs of computers and calculators. The technologies are already here. They just need to be granted the opportunity to compete instead of insuring the current corporation-government symbiosis - all without losing any of our energy requirements.Billions of dollars have been spent on nuclear reactors which currently already have millions of tons of radioactive waste contaminating water, air and earth without any way of getting rid of them. Our current cancer rate may be as high as 10 times the pre-1950 rates. Billions of dollars have been spent on harvesting a hot fusion reaction - because it's a way to get funding for nuclear weapons' advancements without the pesky truth. Virtually nothing has been spent on zero point energy, Aquygen, or cold fusion, except to denounce it by this government, despite continued advancements and partial technology working models.

From: http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_ed_ward_070226_who_s_lying_3f_a_simpl.htm

News Article 1 - Environmental Issue

New Evidence That Global Warming Fuels Stronger Atlantic Hurricanes
Science Daily — Atmospheric scientists have uncovered fresh evidence to support the hotly debated theory that global warming has contributed to the emergence of stronger hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean.
New evidence supports the theory that global warming has contributed to stronger hurricanes. (Credit: NOAA)
The unsettling trend is confined to the Atlantic, however, and does not hold up in any of the world's other oceans, researchers have also found.
Scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported the finding in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The work should help resolve some of the controversy that has swirled around two prominent studies that drew connections last year between global warming and the onset of increasingly intense hurricanes.
"The debate is not about scientific methods, but instead centers around the quality of hurricane data," says lead author James Kossin, a research scientist at UW-Madison's Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies. "So we thought, 'Lets take the first step toward resolving this debate.'"
The inconsistent nature of hurricane data has been a sore spot within the hurricane research community for decades. Before the advent of weather satellites, scientists were forced to rely on scattered ship reports and sailor logs to stay abreast of storm conditions. The advent of weather satellites during the 1960s dramatically improved the situation, but the technology has changed so rapidly that newer satellite records are barely consistent with older ones.
Kossin and his colleagues realized they needed to smooth out the data before exploring any interplay between warmer temperatures and hurricane activity. Working with an existing NCDC archive that holds global satellite information for the years 1983 through 2005, the researchers evened out the numbers by essentially simplifying newer satellite information to align it with older records.
"This new dataset is unlike anything that's been done before," says Kossin. "It's going to serve a purpose as being the only globally consistent dataset around. The caveat of course, is that it only goes back to 1983."
Even so, it's a good start. Once the NCDC researchers recalibrated the hurricane figures, Kossin took a fresh look at how the new numbers on hurricane strength correlate with records on warming ocean temperatures, a side effect of global warming.
What he found both supported and contradicted previous findings. "The data says that the Atlantic has been trending upwards in hurricane intensity quite a bit," says Kossin. "But the trends appear to be inflated or spurious everywhere else, meaning that we still can't make any global statements."
Sea-surface temperatures may be one reason why greenhouse gases are exacting a unique toll on the Atlantic Ocean, says Kossin. Hurricanes need temperatures of around 27 degrees Celsius (81 degrees Fahrenheit) to gather steam. On average, the Atlantic's surface is slightly colder than that but other oceans, such as the Western Pacific, are naturally much warmer.
"The average conditions in the Atlantic at any given time are just on the cusp of what it takes for a hurricane to form," says Kossin. " So it might be that imposing only a small (man-made) change in conditions, creates a much better chance of having a hurricane."
The Atlantic is also unique in that all the physical variables that converge to form hurricanes -- including wind speeds, wind directions and temperatures -- mysteriously feed off each other in ways that only make conditions more ripe for a storm. But scientists don't really understand why, Kossin adds.
"While we can see a correlation between global warming and hurricane strength, we still need to understand exactly why the Atlantic is reacting to warmer temperatures in this way, and that is much more difficult to do," says Kossin. "We need to be creating models and simulations to understand what is really happening here. From here on, that is what we should be thinking about."
The work was funded by the National Science Foundation. Co-authors Daniel Vimont, a UW-Madison atmospheric scientist, Ken Knapp, a scientist at the NCDC, and Richard Murnane, a scientist at the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences, also contributed to the study.


Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University of Wisconsin-Madison.

From: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070228123140.htm

Labels:

Monday, February 26, 2007

Blog Response: Environmental/Political Issues

Recently, other than global warming, another new issue has cropped up that has a profound effect on the world. This is North Korea and the recent pact to freeze all nuclear activities.

The Advent Against Terror

This deal is significant because it marks the end of a tumultuous 3-year effort by US, Russia, China, Japan and South Korea to halt North Korea's nuclear programme. Moreover, just two months before, North Korea held its first nuclear test, shocking the world with this revelation. That marked the zenith of tension between Pyongyang and the rest of the world.
This should come as a relief yet surprise to every person, especially Pyongyang's direct neighbors.

Feeling Sorry for N. Korea

This deal is a win-win situation for both North Korea and the world. China had a great part to play in the success of the deal, acting as an intermediary for both parties, luring the defiant Koreans back to the negotiating table and softening the United States' tough stance on North Korea.
Honestly, I feel sorry for the North Koreans civilians. They are a widely discriminated lot, being collectively labelled as terrorists by US when ironically, most are starving and struggling to survive each day. To make matters worse, US stopped supplying food aid to North Korea, not knowing that the real sufferers are the citizens on the street as the Korean leaders can easily import food via their international underground links. President Kim do not care about the malnourished child on the street, so why should US deprive the ordinary Korean of much-needed food aid?

However, this anomaly was patched when the European Union and US recently blocked all exports of luxuries like abalone, seafood, electronic products to Korea to 'deprive' the Korean regime head honchos. This should be done earlier, rather than affect the poor and innocent Korean.

Pyongyang Down, Teheran Next?
The brokerage of the deal represents a milestone in nuclear disarmament. US has certainly learnt not to be too rash when she deals with North Korea, especially after attacking Iraq because of the presence of “weapons of mass destruction” which up to today have not been found.
Just a few months ago, Iran admitted its nuclear capability, but the US was careful not to attack the oil-rich Gulf state so readily.
Firstly, oil. Iran is the second largest producer of oil after Saudi Arabia, and any attack would certainly shake up the whole petroleum industry. With the US economy so sensitive to the price of oil, its economy will surely come to a standstill.
Secondly, Middle Eastern tension. The feud between Americans and Muslims in the Middle East has not subsided yet. If the US attacked Iran, Muslim countries will come out in full force against US. Unlike Iraq, Iran has an operationally-ready army with battle-hardened and tough generals at its helms.

Again, I am no political analyst but I can foresee that the US would no doubt think twice before attacking Iran lest the whole Middle East stops supplying it the elixir of life - oil.

(500 words)

Labels: , ,

Blog Response: Environmental Issues

About Global Warming

There has been much concern about the worrying issue of global warming recently.
Global warming is the increase of earth's surface temperature due to increasing amounts of atmospheric greenhouse gases like methane or carbon dioxide. It is of great concern as it will lead to dire consequences like rising sea levels due to melting ice caps, among others. Global warming is an unfortunate byproduct of man's irresponsible actions. Therefore, I write this article to raise awareness of this pressing problem.

Different Perspectives, Different Approaches

Different factions of people in our society currently view global warming differently.
The first is the United States and President George Bush. He keeps on denying the effects of global warming which has already been proven “beyond doubt”.
On the other hand, there is the treehuggers' camp. They over exaggerate the implications and effects of global warming to “shock people, governments into taking more serious action”.

Taking Pity on Uncle Sam

There has already been clear scientific evidence to support global warming, yet Bush still denies it, as he has a vested interest in protecting his energy industry, which are the key drivers of US economy. While I am no economist, I fully understand Bush's plight. Bush knows that if he ratifies the Kyoto Protocol, it would severely hamper the growth of its gargantuan automobile and energy industry, with the likes of Ford, Exxon Mobil and Chevron. Add to it a ballooning US trade deficit of US$750 million and a competitive Chinese economy and now you understand the reasons for Bush's denial.

The Real Problem Is...

The threat of global warming is real yet nobody seems to be doing anything about it. The question is whether we should still worry about global warming, which will not really affect us until much later, or concentrate on finding a cure for more pressing problems like malaria or HIV/AIDS, which kill people to the tune of 10 million annually. There are also other problems in the developing world yet to be solved, even simple things like sanitation and water poses huge bureaucracy hurdles. If these simple things we cannot overcome, I guess governments should not be too ambitious to 'solve' global warming.

My view on the future is that we should strive to solve our present problems instead of worrying and pondering about future problems. Sometimes, solving our present problems may naturally lead to that future problem being solved. For example, developing countries like China are burning lots of coal for their energy needs. Rather than trying to clear the air up about global warming (pun unintended), we should nip the problem in its bud – persuade China to use more efficient and less pollutive fuels.
I will end off with a quote. “More time does not solve problems. Lack of time does.” Therefore, we should aim to give ourselves a specific deal line to eradicate all or most present problems, then finally lay the ultimatum to reduce global warming.

(479 words)

Labels: , , ,